Jesus walked down the isle of the local mega Temple, preparing to give a sermon. He had prepared a sermon about what it truly meant to be blessed, but had discarded it because it might be to scathing. As he walked down the isle he noted all the vacant looks on those sitting in comfortably cushioned chairs as air conditioned licked at their skin. As he made it to the pulpit Jesus glanced at the clock. The singing had gone over. Great. He only had 22 minutes to make his tepid sermon. He dare not go over, for the people's time was more important that the possibility that his stale words might be used to change lives. Mentally trimming down his sermon, Jesus began. "Blessed are those who go to church, for their time is so valuable...."
One would be shocked if that were how the Sermon on the Mount began. Or the Feeding of the 5,000. What if Jesus had decided that it was lunch time and sent all those gather, 5,000 men, plus women and children, home to go find food? What if He had put others time and convenience above His own teaching? What if Jesus had limited the power of the Holy Spirit because some people were afraid of getting uncomfortable?
Lately I've been talking to some friends about my beliefs, and I've mentioned that I'm a free-thinking, pro-love, anti-church follower of Christ. Always they get a wrinkle in their brow at the anti-church part. It's almost ironic, this belief of mine has only begun to grow in the last couple of months, but it is now one of my most intense. It took participating in my school's homeless week, living out of my back-pack and sleeping in the student center, to realize how much damage the church is doing.
For so many, church is a place to go on Sunday, and maybe Wednesday. Church is a place where they fellowship with believers and put in their dues. It's a place that's seldom used during most hours of the week except for the few church employees who have to go into the office to prepare for the big day. It's a place that constantly needs remodeling and expansions to attract other believers.
Wrong. Wrong, wrong, wrong. We are the Temple of Christ. We are the Body of Christ. We are the Church. You are the Church. I am the church. The Church is not some building that needs new carpeting. The Church is flesh and blood! The Church is a living, breathing thing. By accepting Christ into your life you become the Church, the Bride-groom of Christ.
The problem with Church these days, in my opinion, is that it kills unity. Look at all the denominations out there! The leader of my small group has told me the story of how her home church when she was little had a church split, half the church taking beards, and the other half beer. I've heard many stories of church splits over silly things like that. We also have the worship wars, followers of Christ getting nasty because they can't agree on what kind of music is sweeter to God's ears.
I have come to the opinion that denominations are killing the body of Christ. I love doctrine and theology. I think it's a great thing, I love knowing why I believe what I believe, and I'll gladly discuss it with joy. Yet, let's be honest here. We will never know for sure if we are correct or not until Christ returns. We can use the scriptures to make educated guesses, but we will not know for sure here on earth.
Then why on earth are we getting all uppity and at each others throats because we disagree? Granted, when someone is teaching something that is clearly against the Bible, it is justified to get uppity, but there is much doctrine that people disagree over that isn't against the Bible, and that is what I'm talking about.
There is a time and a place for new denominations, I will give you that. For example, the split we had between Catholics and protestants with Martin Luther. While I don't have too much of a beef with Catholics, at the time what Pope Leo was doing with the mass printing of indulgences was wrong, and it was justified and commendable for what Martin Luther did, becoming a warrior church (remember, he was the church!).
For a modern day example let's take the Emergent church. When I first learned about the Emergent Church I thought I'd found the place where I belonged. Here was a church that put their faith into action. They are not stagnant. But then I looked into the theology. We have Rob Bell teaching people that truth is like trampoline springs, it's flexible, and that those who follow absolute truth are block heads. Hmmm, this seems to go against Jesus' teaching that He is the Way, the Truth, and The Life. Jesus is the Truth. It's absolute.
The Emergent church is a doctrine that I will not stand behind. Their theology is against the Bible. There should be a separation. Yet I believe that so many of the denominations out there need to be brought together. Unity must be returned. The sleeping giant that is the church must be awoken.
Paul speaks of believers being of one body. When their is disunity in the body, it doesn't function. There is disunity in the Church. We are not functioning correctly. We are the Church of Flesh and Blood, and we're bleeding profusely. Yet everyone ignores the gaping wound, refusing to bandage it, thinking that if we ignore the wound it'll go away. Folks, that's how one gets gangrene. A radical amputation is needed to end this infection before it causes absolute death among the church.
Sometimes I think this is one of those "fighting against one self" situations. Let me explain.
ReplyDeleteHumans by nature are social and simply create organizations and institutions with each other. Thus, we as Christians congregate together on Sunday to worship God. That has become an institution. Of course, anytime tons of humans like to get together problems arise because we are sinful and love to disagree and cause problems and be terrible. The "institution" of church then starts to rub people the wrong way and become a negative thing. So, in this way we are like "Bah. Church is wrong. It's not what we should be doing!" So then I would ask, "What should we be doing?"
Anytime you ask this to someone they say, "Well, it should be more improvised or smaller groups, etc..." A lot of time that happens, but once again people like "order" and "scheduling" so having it be random is just inconvenient and against our nature. Really what this is is another form of human nature: Rebellion. We like to shake things up, change the status quo. Whether or not it is warranted, humans just hate normalcy for too long.
This is similar to a question I heard once about how much time you should spend reading your bible and praying to God. Is there a set amount? Should you be doing it more to be a better Christian? And if you do do all that what if it becomes boring or you get tired of it? You became dead to it all but you do it by habit anyway? Humans are creatures of habit. We need to be setting time with God. We do it with everything else. Though we also need to remember personally that its not just another check mark on the list.
In the same regard, Church is an institution, a set time, that all Christians can come together in their various geographical locations to worship God. Could it be better? Absolutely. Should there be change? Totally. But that's also true of our own personal lives.
Church is a big building full of sinful people who only have the cross of Christ to cling to to save themselves from damnation. Is that reason for them to all say to each other "This church this is ridiculous. We should just all be anti-church". Probably not, as a benefit of the church is for sinful people to be together, helping each other in life, and building each other up. Continually growing in their sanctification. There Christ will be also helping us to walk with him, walk like him, and be like him.
Church has problems. We have problems. But for some reason I feel as if rather than saying " No more church!" or "The church has to be united!" Let's just be a servant leader in our churches building others up and working to make our church glorifying to God.
You definitely have some good points too. And I don't think that everyone should just stop going to church. There are benefits, by far. I still go to church, and I still get things out of it. Yet..... I have this longing that it would be so much more.
ReplyDeleteI was actually talking to our Chaplin, Harland about this a while back. His words have stuck with me: "Derek, you've got to remember that the church is made up of sinners. We are all sinners, we are all imperfect." When I think about the changes needed to the church, I can't help but think about what Harland said.
We are imperfect beings, and won't be made perfect until the return of Christ. One of my favorite authors, Donald Miller, talks about this often. He mentions that we won't become the person that Jesus has meant us to be until His return. Yet Paul speaks a lot about the hope we have in Christ, and how this hope is enough to last us until Christ returns.
But now I'm rambling. I think it's way to early in the morning...
As much as I think there needs to be changes in the church, I do find myself at a loss. I was talking to one of my friends about this, and he asked me "What do you think should be done to fix this?" I don't have the answer. It's something I think about a lot, though. For one to offer criticism, one should offer a solution. I have none. Except that we need to start small. We must start the revival of Christ at a local level, in our churches, and branch out from there.
That said, I do think that some churches have it more right than others. In practice I'm not a fan of mega churches. However, there is a church in New York, a mega church, if you will, that I love. That's the Brooklyn Tabernacle. I have read multiple books by the pastor, Jim Cymbala. In "Fresh wind, Fresh fire" he talks about how for a church to be alive they must pray. Prayer must be at the root of all things, or they'll fail. If you're ever looking for a good read, check it out, you will not be disappointed.
Thanks for your thoughts, Jason. They've challenged me. I'll have to give some more thought to them once I've had a nights sleep!
I wouldn't discount the emergent church, as doctrine is all over the place, Rob Bell has just one set of beliefs amongst thousands. You may well find something more agreeable.
ReplyDeleteAs far as disunity and such... maybe money causing distance is part of it. Case in point, folks donate money, rather than time and talents. Such distances them from the action, from preaching the Gospel, from loving one another as Jesus would, rather it outsources such to just a few folks. Imagine if 10,000 Christians from all denominations left their jobs for two months to go work with each other in Haiti, rather than just sending money... Lots of hearts would be changed amongst the volunteers... they would not see each other as in error, but more so, as real brothers and sisters in Christ in their hearts.